Announcement

Collapse

Welcome to Moorcock's Miscellany

Dear reader,

Many people have given their valuable time to create a website for the pleasure of posing questions to Michael Moorcock, meeting people from around the world, and mining the site for information. Please follow one of the links above to learn more about the site.

Thank you,
Reinart der Fuchs
See more
See less

Sabbath is Conan; Zeppelin is Lord of the Rings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dead-Air
    replied
    I read that article too, and it pissed me off. Sabbath is so much more H.P. Lovecraft than Robert E. Howard! I'm fine with Zeppelin being Tolkein, but that only explains why I like Sabbath and Hawkwind so much more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mikey_C
    replied
    Wasn't it whoever's responsible for the Epic of Gilgamesh? And the music? Crikey, we're pre-Elvis here....

    Leave a comment:


  • HawkLord
    replied
    Robert Plant was certainly a fan of lord of the rings as Battle of Evermore can testify! A number of their other songs have LOTR references, for example in Ramble On, when he says 'Golum, the evil one, crept up and stole away with her'(I think!).

    Leave a comment:


  • Doc
    replied
    Nice thread title! You sucked me in :D

    British rock bands aside, I also understand (not agree with) the Tolkien reference more than the Howard one.

    Maybe the point they were trying to make was something like this: other bands were doing what Sabbath and Zepplin were doing, but until they put the elements together in the package they did, most people didn't pay attention.

    I think you could make a similar argument for both Howard and Tolkien. They did what other people were doing, but put all the elements in a slightly different package and people started paying attention to a (sorry, I have to do it) genre.

    I might actually argue that Leiber did more to establish the form than either Tolkien or Howard (although it would, perhaps, be best to claim that Dunsany, Clark Ashton Smith, and Poul Anderson--among many others--originated it). Now I have to re-read Wizardry and Wild Romance. :D Regardless, the form was established well enough for deCamp and Pratt to satirize it in the early 40's.

    As far as the musical arguments go, I think the analogies of Sabbath and Howard, and Zepplin and Tolkien are apt.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sabbath is Conan; Zeppelin is Lord of the Rings

    This isn't really a rock-and-roll thread, as the subject line might suggest, though the impetus to this post was something I read in a book about rock legends Led Zeppelin.

    In his book, Led Zeppelinآ´s Led Zeppelin IV (33 1/3), Erik Davis writes:

    "Like all origin stories, this one depends on your frame of reference, your own lineages, your taste. It’s very much like the question of who deserves blame for the genre of heroic fantasy, whose multi-volume sagas of dwarf-lords and magic blades continue to clog the SF sections of bookstores. Hardcore sword-and-sorcery buffs will rightly name the pulp peregrinations of Robert E. Howard’s Conan, while more literary types will nominate, with equal justification, Tolkien’s "Lord of the Rings". Sabbath is Conan; Zeppelin is Lord of the Rings."

    8O HUH!? "Hardcore sword-and-sorcery buffs will rightly name" Robert E. Howard's Conan as the beginning of heroic fantasy? I don't think so! The Tolkien remark I can tolerate, I suppose, but Howard? I like Robert Howard, mind you, but he was definitely NOT the start of heroic fantasy. Sorry. Nope.
Working...
X