First I would like to apologize for my english (french people -like me- are not so good at learning languages ... maybe an old imparialist reminiscence).
About Noam Chomsky, I was a fan of his books and theories ... but I have some doubts about him :
- first I find his analysis without any nuance (it is certainly subversive, and it gives an intersting viewpoint on hte political history of america, but it is not always as serous as it seems).
- second, Chomsky made a preface of Faurisson's book "Mأ©moire en dأ©fense contre ceux qui m'accusent de falsifier l'histoire. La question des chambres أ gaz, La Vieille Taupe, 1980" which is a real antisemite publication. This preface is an excellent example of the "double language" that Chomsky used to denounce ...
About Noam Chomsky, I was a fan of his books and theories ... but I have some doubts about him :
- first I find his analysis without any nuance (it is certainly subversive, and it gives an intersting viewpoint on hte political history of america, but it is not always as serous as it seems).
- second, Chomsky made a preface of Faurisson's book "Mأ©moire en dأ©fense contre ceux qui m'accusent de falsifier l'histoire. La question des chambres أ gaz, La Vieille Taupe, 1980" which is a real antisemite publication. This preface is an excellent example of the "double language" that Chomsky used to denounce ...
Comment