Though Kerry wasn't clear as he needed to be about "the global test", I feel he was able to convey a seriousness about bringing troops home. I'd like to know more about his plan for Iraq. As a veteran who hasn't seen action, I know what the "hurry up and wait" game is all about.
Bush seemed to avoid characteristic fumbles in speech, but his message was all paternalistic sentiment and was unable to convey any sense of a plan, unless, of course, he was saying hurry up and wait in the desert. Of it all, WMD is his major weakness; instead of having more, everyone else has more.
Of the two, Kerry seemed to be the most confident and had strong arguments. The only advantage Bush had in the debate was his flip-flop thing which really did turn against him, and he was forced to describe that the lives of American soldiers were the price of his inflexibility.
Bush had no real answers for Kerry's condemming questions, and so, I give this debate to Kerry.
Bush seemed to avoid characteristic fumbles in speech, but his message was all paternalistic sentiment and was unable to convey any sense of a plan, unless, of course, he was saying hurry up and wait in the desert. Of it all, WMD is his major weakness; instead of having more, everyone else has more.
Of the two, Kerry seemed to be the most confident and had strong arguments. The only advantage Bush had in the debate was his flip-flop thing which really did turn against him, and he was forced to describe that the lives of American soldiers were the price of his inflexibility.
Bush had no real answers for Kerry's condemming questions, and so, I give this debate to Kerry.
Comment